Festival Music
Venera Gimadieva
Queen's Hall
Keith Bruce
four stars
THERE was an astonishing pianist at the Queen's Hall on Friday, so it looked a little disappointing that his scheduled second-half Rachmaninov prelude was to be omitted from the programme performed. Pavel Nebolsin's virtuosic performance of Tchaikovsky's Dumka of 1884, a sort of Russian folk tale without words, was, however, eventually followed by a solo encore of his own superbly flashy arrangement of Piazzolla's Libertango, so the deficit was made up.
I think I might have enjoyed hearing Venera Gimadieva sing the vocal version of that piece too, because this was actually the coloratura soprano's show, even if the rapport with her colleague from the Bolshoi was crucial to its success. Her choice of songs was an education in the Russian art-song of he 19th and 20th Centuries, with four by Tchaikovsky the oldest of them, but often sounding the most modern in melody, accompaniment and subject matter. After demonstrating flawless control of her superb instrument of Lullaby, the last of them, Pimpinella, clearly commenting on the composer's own suppressed sexual inclinations.
On the brace of songs by Sergey Vasilenko that followed, the soprano became two very different women: the first, setting Pushkin Prize-winning poet Mirra Lokhvitskaya, very much in control, the folk song maiden of the second rather more coy and fatalistic.
There was a vein of wordless singing running through her programme from the conclusion of Rimsky-Korsakov's The Nymph, via Reinhold Gliere's setting of Konstantin Balmont's version of Rusalka, to Vocalise, which concluded her set of Rachmaninov songs. That piece perhaps excepted, Gimadieva's welcome international glamour and full-on performance also brought some very interesting choices to eager Edinburgh ears.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here