Britain will not pay a £39 billion exit bill to Brussels if it does not secure a trade deal, Brexit Secretary David Davis has said.
The comments appeared to contradict those of Chancellor Philip Hammond who has said it would be "inconceivable" the UK would fail to honour its international obligations.
Pressed on the Chancellor's remarks regarding the exit payment, Mr Davis told BBC1's The Andrew Marr Show: "No. It is conditional on an outcome. I am afraid that wasn't quite right.
"It is conditional. It is conditional on getting an implementation period. Conditional on a trade outcome.
"No deal means that we won't be paying the money."
Asked if the Chancellor was wrong, Mr Davis said: "It has been made clear by No 10 already. So that's not actually new."
When asked at a Commons Treasury Committee meeting last week whether Britain's divorce bill was contingent on a trade deal, the Chancellor said: "Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed in this negotiation.
"But I find it inconceivable that we as a nation would be walking away from an obligation that we recognised as an obligation.
"That is not a credible scenario. That is not the kind of country we are. Frankly, it would not make us a credible partner for future international agreements."
Mr Davis said the chances of Britain leaving the EU without a trade deal have now "dropped dramatically".
The Cabinet heavyweight insisted that the agreement secured with Brussels to trigger talks on a post-Brexit relationship made the prospect of the UK being forced back into World Trade Organisation (WTO) tariff trading arrangements after withdrawal much less likely.
Mr Davis said: "The odds, as it were, against a WTO, or no deal outcome, have dropped dramatically."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel