THE minister in charge of benefits sanctions has admitted there have been “cases where we get it wrong”, when quizzed about poverty and homelessness rising under the Tories.
David Gauke was challenged about whether the sanctions regime - seen as capricious and perverse by critics - had contributed to the problems.
Since 2010, rough sleeping has risen 134 per cent and the number of children living in temporary accommodation by 70 per cent.
The Work and Pension Secretary said the suspension of benefits for claimants who failed to attend interviews or seek work was intended to change people’s behaviour, and said people with mental health problems could be helped by the structure of being in work.
He said: “We have a welfare system that is based on conditionality, and rightly so. We pay money to people but there are certain conditions that are in place.
"We do expect people to comply with those conditions.
"In some cases where those conditions are not met, it is appropriate to have a sanction."
He added: "That's not to say that there aren't hard cases, cases where we get it wrong, we want to work very hard to eliminate that."
Expert psychologists, psychotherapists, psychoanalysts and counsellors have previously warned sanctions could damage the mental health of claimants.
Mr Gauke said: "On the subject of mental health - and this is a sensitive point, and I'm not going to pretend that we have always got this right in every individual case - but we do know that getting people into work, giving people the benefit of working, the structure that provides, the self-esteem that that provides, work can really help mental health as well.
"When it comes to the sanctions regime, actually we've seen fewer sanctions over 2017 than we did in 2016 and 2015, so the number of sanctions is coming down."
DWP figures show just 0.4 per cent of jobseeker's allowance claimants faced sanctions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel