More than 33,000 people have signed a petition opposing rough sleepers being cleared from Windsor before the royal wedding.
Tory council leader Simon Dudley said beggars could present the town in a "sadly unfavourable light" when Prince Harry marries American actress Meghan Markle in May.
In a letter to police, he complained about "aggressive begging and intimidation", and "bags and detritus" on the streets.
A petition to stop rough sleepers being taken off the streets attracted more than 33,300 signatures by Saturday evening.
Holly Fishwick, who launched the campaign on change.org, wrote: "I'm calling for this demand on the local police force to be withdrawn, and for people who are homeless not to be removed.
"Instead the council and local authorities should offer a suitable long-term solution for these people, including safe and secure accommodation and health advice and support."
She added that Mr Dudley's view "actually goes against the philanthropic ethos of the couple whose wedding is being celebrated".
Both Harry and Ms Markle have done charity work in the past, with the Prince focusing specifically on mental health and homeless issues.
In a series of twitter posts Mr Dudley, Windsor and Maidenhead council leader, claimed rough sleepers had made a "commercial life choice" to prey on others.
He said police should use their powers under the 1824 Vagrancy Act and the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 to "protect residents and tourists".
His comments also attracted criticism from homeless charities and Prime Minister Theresa May said she disagreed with his assessment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel