Philip Hammond has risked stoking Tory divisions over Europe by saying the UK should seek a “middle way” in Brexit negotiations in order to maximise access to EU markets.
The Chancellor said there were critics on both sides of the Brexit divide in the Tory party who did not back a “pragmatic” approach to leaving the European Union (EU).
The comments come after he was rebuked by Downing Street for saying he hoped the UK and the EU would only move “very modestly” apart in trade terms – although Mr Hammond said he had not spoken to Theresa May since he delivered the speech which triggered the latest round of Tory turmoil.
In a sign of the unrest in Conservative ranks, leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg has warned the Government’s “timid and cowering” approach risked squandering the potential gains of leaving the EU.
However, Mr Hammond insisted the approach to Brexit would not be swayed by Tory rebels on either side of the EU divide.
“There are people on both sides of this argument who do not support us in our intention to deliver the Brexit that the British people have mandated in a pragmatic way that protects British businesses and British jobs,” he told Sky News.
“There are people that wanted to stay in the EU customs union, we reject that argument.
“There are people that want us to sever our trade links with Europe and give up this market, we reject their arguments too.
“We have got to stick to the middle way, which is negotiating the maximum access we can get to European markets compatible with the red lines we have already set out about repatriating control over our laws, our borders and our money.”
Defending his “very modest” comments, Mr Hammond said: “The smaller the changes that happen to our access to market and to frictions at the borders, the better.”
In response to Mr Rees-Mogg’s criticism, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt insisted the Government’s approach to Brexit was not “timid”.
He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “Anyone who uses the word ‘timid’ about this Prime Minister is absolutely wrong.
“This is the Prime Minister that gave us absolute clarity after the Brexit vote that we were going to get back control of our laws, our borders, our money – the most profound strategic decision any prime minister has to make in the current circumstances.”
Mr Hunt said the UK should expect “very limited” changes – or possibly none at all – to EU market access in a Brexit deal.
“We actually start with 100% alignment and that means – and this is the crucial point that he was making – is that we should be able to expect very limited and possibly no changes to market access as a result of the free trade deal we negotiate. That is something we can be very positive about.”
In a speech on Friday, Brexit Secretary David Davis will seek to reassure Tory Eurosceptics that the UK will exercise its independence as soon as the country leaves the EU.
He will insist that Britain will be able to sign trade deals with other countries during the transition period after leaving the EU in March 2019, despite being largely tied into Brussels’ rules during a two-year post-Brexit transition.
Speaking in Middlesbrough, he will say: “As an independent country, no longer a member of the European Union – the United Kingdom will once again have its own trading policy.
“For the first time in more than 40 years, we will be able to step out and sign new trade deals with old friends, and new allies, around the globe.”
While the UK will replicate the effects of the EU customs union during the “implementation period”, this “should not preclude us from formally negotiating – or indeed signing – trade agreements”.
Any such deals would enter into force at the end of the implementation period.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here