Directors of collapsed construction giant Carillion have been accused of being “contemptuous” of their pension obligations.
The chairman of a select committee said letters he had received since a Parliamentary inquiry was launched suggested they “refused to give an inch” to the company’s pension schemes.
Frank Field, who chairs the Work and Pensions Committee, said he hoped the Pension Regulator was now “going after” some of the “very generous” bonuses paid to directors.
In one letter in 2013, the trustee of five Carillion schemes tells the Pension Regulator that the December 2011 actuarial valuations and associated documentation could not be signed off by the statutory deadline of March 2013.
The trustee said an “impasse” had been reached and called for a formal intervention by the regulator.
Mr Field said: “These letters suggest the Carillion directors were contemptuous of their pensions obligations.
“Over two successive 15-month negotiations they refused to give an inch to the pension schemes.
“Their private pleading that the company could not afford more was in stark contrast to the rosy picture – and bumper dividends – being presented to the outside world.
“Richard Adam, the longstanding finance director, has particular questions to answer.
“With characteristic alacrity, the Pensions Regulator started its arduous process of chasing money down from Carillion a few days after it was formally announced there was no money left.
“I can only assume – and hope – they are going after some of those very generous bonuses.”
The pensions regulator opened an investigation into Carillion on January 18, three days after it went into insolvency.
The number of Carillion workers who have lost their jobs has topped 1,000.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here