Former BHS owner Dominic Chappell has been ordered to pay £87,170 after failing to provide information about the firm’s pension schemes to investigators when it collapsed with the loss of thousands of jobs.
Chappell, director of Retail Acquisitions, which bought BHS for £1 from billionaire Sir Philip Green in 2015, was prosecuted by The Pensions Regulator (TPR) under the Pensions Act 2004.
Self-described entrepreneur Chappell had claimed he did “everything and more” to help the regulator but he was convicted of three charges after a four-day trial in January.
He was ordered to pay a £50,000 fine and £37,670 in court costs at Barkingside Magistrates’ Court in London on Friday.
BHS went into administration in April 2016, leaving a £571 million pension deficit. Sir Philip later agreed to pay £363 million towards it.
Speaking outside court, Chappell said the sentence was “harsh” and that he has launched an appeal.
Chappell had told the hearing he would have to take out a loan if he was fined, saying the “great perception of me having millions from BHS” was not true and that he had been left “financially crippled”.
He added: “I’m in arrears on a number of bills at the moment – I can’t afford to pay,” with “huge amounts of cash flooding out the door”.
District Judge Gary Lucie ordered Chappell to pay the fine at a rate of £2,500 a month.
Judge Lucie said: “There’s been a complete lack of remorse on Mr Chappell’s part.
“Even when asked questions about his means he gave a self-serving and uninvited diatribe about the case.
“His counsel Mr Levy said he was a ‘victim in all this’ – in my mind that cannot be further from the truth.”
The businessman’s outgoings included £3,800 a month rent on the Dorset home where he lives with his wife and children, around £32,000 a year renting a new Range Rover and £2,500 a month on private school fees.
He said his only income is his salary of between £2,700 and £3,000 as a consultant for a small cosmetics company.
Chappell’s assets include a house near Blandford Forum, which he says is heavily mortgaged and has no equity, and shares in a property investment company based in Gibraltar, which owns land in Portugal.
He said he has also been served with a £10 million contribution notice from TPR.
Judge Lucie said Chappell had failed to fully disclose his financial situation and failed to tell prosecutors about the Dorset property.
He added that Chappell has “extensive outgoings” and must be accruing more income than he claimed.
Last month Chappell’s trial defence said he could not provide information as he had been locked out of the chain’s headquarters after it folded, but this was dismissed by the judge as “simply not believable”.
Following seven hours of deliberation last month, District Judge William Ashworth said Chappell was not a credible witness and convicted him of failing to provide information to the regulator over a 10-month period.
On more than one occasion as he delivered his judgment at Brighton Magistrates’ Court in January, Judge Ashworth said: “I do not believe the defendant’s account at all.”
Former BHS store manager Lin Macmillan said: “I think he should have been fined more to be honest because during the one year that he was the owner he took an awful lot more than that out of the business.”
Nicola Parish, TPR director of regulation, said: “We prosecuted Dominic Chappell because despite numerous requests he failed to provide us with information we required in connection with our investigation into the sale and ultimate collapse of BHS.
“Choosing not to comply has now left him with a criminal record and a bill for more than £87,000, both of which he could have avoided if he had simply done what was required of him.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here