MSPs are expected to agree that the Scottish Government’s Brexit continuity Bill should be treated as emergency legislation.
The move, if backed, would mean the legislation would be rushed through the Scottish Parliament on a much-shortened timetable, allowing it potentially to be approved in just three weeks.
Ministers in Edinburgh insist this is necessary as the legislation must be passed before the UK Government’s European Union (Withdrawal) Bill makes its final passage through the House of Lords.
The Scottish Government has brought forward its own Bill as an alternative to the UK legislation, amid an ongoing dispute over what devolved administrations have branded a “power grab” by Westminster.
When Holyrood agrees to treat a Bill as emergency legislation, there is no need for a committee of MSPs to first take evidence on the proposals and produce a report on them.
Instead the legislation goes straight to the chamber for MSPs to make a decision on its general principles.
Under the proposed schedule, these could be approved for the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill on Wednesday March 7, with the legislation due to get final approval just two weeks later on March 21.
Holyrood Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh has already ruled the Scottish continuity legislation to be outside of the Scottish Parliament’s legislative authority – although First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the Government “respectfully” disagreed with that opinion.
She described the Bill as an “important piece of legislation that we need to introduce to protect the Scottish Parliament”.
However, Prime Minister Theresa May has insisted the proposals – as well as similar legislation being put forward in Wales – are “unnecessary”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel