Before the last referendum the Scottish Government published what was meant to be a blue print for an independent Scotland.
It’s been criticised even from within the SNP, though much appears harsh as the value of oil constantly changes and not every position could expect uniform support.
If anything, it’s coverage was too wide in many areas and insufficiently detailed in others. That more than the price of oil which dropped but has since risen again, damaged it.
Read more: Independent Scotland can rise above Brexit-style row, report insists
The SNP have sought to learn lessons from that with the publication of the Scottish Growth Commission report.
It’s much more tightly focused on economic growth and other social policies, and devoid of the myriad of detail in the previous document on everything from agriculture to the security services.
Though civil servants did their best on the last occasion, this is a much heavier weight document.
Read more: Jim Sillars: Growth Commission has depth, detail and intellectual rigour
Understandable given its more limited remit yet considerably greater academic and expert input.
It’ll be subject to the same scrutiny and much the same criticism as its predecessor, though it’ll perhaps be harder for opponents to score so many hits.
Treated almost as an academic document and subject to considerable review even before publication, that along with the qualifications and credentials of its authors will sustain it from some but not all attacks. After all academic documents are themselves subject to visceral debate.
Read more: John Curtice: Growth Commission is a bid to find answers but necessary steps won’t all be popular
It’s hard though to see how those who oppose independence will be persuaded but hostility from some may be mellowed given the credibility of the authors.
Likewise, suggestions of splits in the Independence campaign over its growth agenda and reference to free markets states such as New Zealand are spurious.
As with “Scotland’s Future” many will campaign for the cause albeit with a different vision of the Scotland they seek.
Read more: David Bell: Growth Commission is a reasoned economic case but it won’t please everyone
Issues like currency are complex and slow burn which is why the delay in publication of it has been surprising.
Persuading everyone is impossible but having a credible argument essential.
Many people will feel unqualified to comment on some issues but are persuaded by the general credibility surrounding an argument and especially the stature of those supporting it.
Read more: Ronald MacDonald: Growth Commission has too many deficiencies to be credible
So, it’s a substantial contribution on the social and economic arguments for independence adding ballast and some credibility to the debate.
But, at the end of the day it’s a political not academic argument and the court of public opinion will decide.
Kenny MacAskill is a former Justice Secretary and SNP MSP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel