Men with otherwise untreatable prostate cancer could halt its spread and survive longer by undergoing immunotherapy treatment, a major trial has shown.
More than a third of men with a very advanced form of the cancer were still alive and one in 10 had not seen it grow after a year on the drug pembrolizumab, the study found.
It is the first time immunotherapy has been shown to benefit some men with prostate cancer, the researchers said.
The results of the trial, led by a team at the Institute of Cancer Research, London, and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in Chicago.
Professor Johann de Bono, director of the drug development unit, said: "In the last few years immunotherapy has changed the way we treat many advanced cancers - but up to now no one had demonstrated a benefit in men with prostate cancer.
"Our study has found that immunotherapy can benefit a subset of men with advanced, otherwise untreatable prostate cancer, and these are most likely to include patients who have specific DNA repair mutations within their tumours."
Immunotherapy drugs work by stimulating the immune system to recognise and fight the cancer. They are used to treat some advanced cancers, including lung.
The trial of 258 men with advanced prostate cancer found they lived much longer when treated with "checkpoint inhibitor" pembrolizumab.
Around 38% were still alive after a year and 11% did not see the cancer grow, the results show.
Previous trials using immunotherapy in prostate cancer have been unsuccessful but the latest research examined the genetics of the tumours and found particular groups of patients may benefit.
While only 5% of men in the trial saw their tumours shrink or disappear after treatment, many of those had mutations in genes involved in repairing DNA in their tumours.
The researchers suggest these mutating cancer cells may be easy for the immune system to recognise and attack because they look different from healthy cells.
Data from some other cancer types, such as bowel, has similarly shown tumours with defects in DNA repair mutations are more susceptible to immunotherapy.
Professor de Bono said: "We are planning a new clinical trial, specifically in men with prostate cancer whose tumours have mutations in DNA repair genes, to see if immunotherapy can become a standard part of their treatment.
"It's exciting that immunotherapy could offer some men more time with their loved ones where they have such advanced disease that they have run out of existing treatment options."
Only around 20% of cancer patients respond to immunotherapy - something which researchers do not fully understand why.
Professor Paul Workman, chief executive of the Institute of Cancer Research in London, said: "Immunotherapy has proven to be a smarter, kinder treatment for many types of cancer - but it still only works for a minority of patients.
"The challenges we now face are how to predict in advance who will benefit, and how to make immunotherapy work for more people.
"One of the major challenges with immunotherapy is that we don't have many reliable tests to pick out who will benefit.
"This new trial has found that testing for mutations in DNA repair genes could be valuable marker of who will respond.
"If we can prove that in the planned new trial, it should be possible to provide some men with advanced prostate cancer with an exciting new treatment option."
Research will now focus on identifying markers to help pick out the prostate cancer patients whose tumours are most likely to shrink after immunotherapy treatment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here