Sajid Javid has defended the Government’s proposed new anti-terror laws, insisting they are “not part of a sinister strategy to create an Orwellian state”.
The Home Secretary said critics have “wrongfully” argued that the legislation risks criminalising thought.
Last week ministers unveiled a raft of measures aimed at boosting anti-terror laws following five attacks last year.
A number of existing offences will be tweaked under the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill to close off potential loopholes.
For example, the offence of inviting support for a banned terror group will be extended to capture the expression of supportive opinions that are “reckless as to whether others will be encouraged to support the organisation”.
An official impact assessment document said that, given the way the existing offence is constructed, it has not always been possible to take action against people who make inflammatory public speeches in which they made it clear that they supported Daesh – also known as Islamic State – or another proscribed organisation, but do not invite others to do so.
In anticipation of possible civil liberties complaints about the impact on freedom of speech, the Government stressed it was not making it unlawful to hold a private view in support of a terrorist organisation.
“But it is right to criminalise those who make clear expressions of support for terrorist organisations, and who are reckless as to whether that will encourage others to support the organisation,” said a Home Office factsheet.
However, campaign group Liberty argued the plans would “make thought-crime a reality”.
In an article for the Guardian, the Home Secretary said the changes “will make us safer” but emphasised there was “no blank cheque” when deciding on the approach.
“I totally reject any attempt to simplify today’s debate into one of security versus liberty,” he said.
The Bill also proposes to amend offences relating to the encouragement of terrorism and dissemination of terrorist material so they can apply in cases where conduct is directed at a child or vulnerable adult who may not understand what they are being encouraged to do.
Other steps include raising from two to five years the maximum period fingerprints and DNA may be retained on national security grounds in cases where a person has not been convicted of an offence, and amending the crime of collecting information likely to be useful to a terrorist to cover the repeated viewing or streaming of material online.
Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation Max Hill QC said he was included in some of the discussion about the plans.
“I agree with some of the Bill proposals, but do not agree with others, and I look forward to expanding on this in front of the Bill Committee later this month,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel