TURNOUT in the SNP depute leadership contest fell to around 26 per cent, fuelling claims that party members have become apathetic over the leadership’s caution on a second independence referendum.
It has also emerged that around 103,000 people were eligible to vote in the recent three-candidate race, despite the official membership figure in April standing at 118,000.
SNP members have voted in two depute leadership contests since 2016. In the earlier election, Angus Robertson defeated MP Tommy Sheppard, MEP Alyn Smith and councillor Chris McEleny to become Nicola Sturgeon’s number two.
At the time, the SNP put out a press release with the result as well the number of votes cast and the turnout, which stood at 33.9 per cent.
Robertson’s resignation this year triggered another contest, which pitted Cabinet Secretary Keith Brown, activist Julie Hepburn and McEleny against each other.
Although the SNP announced Brown as the winner, further details about the contest were not provided.
The Sunday Herald understands the number of members who voted in the election stood at nearly 26,800 which, on a turnout of over 26 per cent, means around 103,000 people were eligible to vote.
However, a House of Commons briefing paper published in May stated: “In April 2018, SNP membership was around 118,000, compared to 25,000 in December 2013.”
It is believed the gap between the 103,000 “eligible” voters and the 118,000 members is explained by under 16s not being able to vote, as well as people whose subscriptions are not fully up to date.
While nearly 26,800 members took part in this year’s contest, the figure in 2016 was closer to 35,000. One senior SNP source said a number of members were happy to have a party card as a symbol of their commitment, but were not interested in internal elections.
A second insider said the First Minister’s perceived caution on a second independence referendum had created a “vacuum” and the “conditions for apathy”.
However, the SNP received a boost last week after announcing that over 7,000 people had joined following the row at Westminster over the powers of the Scottish Parliament.
Westminster group leader Ian Blackford led a walkout of SNP MPs as a protest at what he believed was the UK Government’s disrespect for devolution.
Although the SNP provided rolling updates on the number of new recruits, the party has not confirmed its total membership number in the wake of the rise. After the Blackford row, the SNP wrote to former members asking them to rejoin.
Asked whether any of the 7,000 were individuals in arrears, the SNP press office did not respond.
An SNP spokesperson said: “Keith Brown achieved an impressive 55 per cent of eligible votes and is already hard at work in opposing the Tory power grab, which this week sparked a further surge in SNP membership.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel