Union leaders yesterday demanded urgent talks with Royal Bank of Scotland over concern for the group's 100,000 workers and the future of its insurance divisions, following fears that they could be sold off to raise much-needed capital.
The union move came as speculation was rife that Barclays and HBoS would be next in line to appeal to shareholders for funding as banks seek to boost balance sheets. Experts believe RBS's £12bn capital-raising move could open the floodgates for a raft of rights issues.
It has emerged that RBS, which has 17,000 staff in Scotland, is likely to further bolster its financing by selling off its Direct Line and Churchill insurance operations.
Graham Goddard, Unite deputy general secretary, said: "The trading announcement by RBS is a reflection of the challenging environment the financial services sector is facing. Unite has serious concerns about the potential implications for the 100,000 employees of RBS.
"The news that RBS is to review their insurance divisions, Churchill and Direct Line, will cause uncertainty for staff as to their future."
Sir Fred Goodwin later sought to reassure staff. "We have been taking steps to reassure our staff that on selling the business we are not indicating there is anything wrong with it and the sort of people who are stepping up as potential owners would all be appropriate owners and a source of substance and stability for that business.
"It is not going to be sold unless we can attract a very high price for it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article