Scotland’s Energy Minister has called on UK ministers to reduce the cost of energy for those who are struggling during the cost-of-living crisis.
The Scottish Government is pleading for a so-called ‘social tariff’ to be set up, which would lead to those on means-tested benefits pay less to fuel their homes.
In a letter to the UK Government’s minister for energy consumers, Amanda Solloway, Gillian Martin pushed for the measure to be introduced, using the proceeds of a windfall tax on oil and gas companies when prices are “unprecedently high”, as opposed to a levy on energy bills.
A UK Government spokesman said all measures to help those in need are being kept “under review”.
Read more: Over 1200 more Scots treated for hypothermia in energy bills crisis
In her letter, Ms Martin wrote: “The Scottish Government has called repeatedly on the UK Government to deliver a social tariff mechanism for those who need it the most, and our call has been supported by partners across the energy industry and the third sector.
“The Scottish Government believes that a social tariff should be funded primarily through the Energy Profits Levy (or a similar mechanism) when energy prices are unprecedentedly high, with recourse to general taxation as prices fall.
“A specific levy on energy bills to fund and deliver a social tariff will not only place undue hardship on priority consumers, but also disincentivise energy savings in the same way that high standing charges currently do.
Read more: Harvie calls for UK action so heat pumps lead to lower energy bills
“I would also like to reiterate my previous offer to work with the UK Government on the design of a social tariff mechanism.”
As well as automatically including those currently on means-tested benefits, the tariff should also make efforts to help those who are “narrowly ineligible for benefits, are on low incomes and are now in or at risk of living within fuel poverty and readily available data already retrieved through existing UK Government support schemes could help achieve this”.
Social tenants and those who have high energy use due to medical or life-saving equipment should also benefit, Ms Martin said.
A spokesman for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: “We recognise the cost-of-living challenges families are facing and we spent £40 billion paying around half a typical household’s energy bill last winter.
Read more: Analysis: Can Keir Starmer's clean energy rhetoric match with real action?
“Energy prices are falling and our Energy Price Guarantee remains in place to protect people until April next year.
“We’re also continuing to support the most vulnerable, with three million households expected to benefit from the £150 Warm Home Discount, £900 for those on means-tested benefits, and an extra £150 for disabled people.”
“We continue to keep all options under review for those most in need.”
Hazel Knowles, the energy lead at Advice Direct Scotland, said it has “witnessed significant demand” from people across Scotland for its services, adding: “With bills still significantly higher than they were before the energy crisis began, we know far too many Scots face a challenging winter ahead, forced to choose between heating and eating.
“Although there are regulations for suppliers to provide support, the current situation means this does not go far enough to support those struggling to pay and getting into unaffordable debt.
“Energy affordability is a long-term problem that needs a long-term solution. A social tariff would protect people from spending excessive amounts on their bills.”
But any social tariff, she said, will need to consider the “unique challenges” facing Scotland’s energy landscape, with criteria based on household income and energy efficiency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel