A CARER would not have been stabbed to death by her foster son if he had been taken into care sooner, an inquiry has heard.
An expert report commissioned for the fatal accident inquiry into the death of Dawn McKenzie found that it could have been prevented if more prompt action had been taken by social workers.
It said that the boy was allowed to live with his birth family, where he suffered 'chronic neglect', for too long.
When he was taken into care by Glasgow City Council in 2008 he was sleeping on a trampoline, had no shoes, was living in a house frequented by drug addicts and had been subjected to 'frequent acts of violence'.
The boy was placed with Mrs McKenzie, 34, and her husband Bryan in Hamilton, Lanarkshire, in November 2010. He killed her in June 2011 at her home when he was just 13.
He was jailed for seven years in 2012 after admitting culpable homicide on the grounds of diminished responsibility.
The expert report's author Kirsty McLean wrote: "I have little doubt that had he been removed from home a number of years earlier he would not have committed this dreadful, violent crime."
Kevin Brown, 53, a senior social worker at Glasgow City Council, told the inquiry there were failings in the case but denied swifter action could have prevented Mrs McKenzie's death.
He said: "If you look at it now we should probably have taken action at an earlier stage.
"I would be more inclined post this case not to leave children in a home like that for a significant period of time.
"I think it's too much of a jump to say if we had taken these steps it wouldn't have resulted in the death of Mrs McKenzie."
Mr Brown admitted social workers dealing with the boy should have found him a permanent care place before the killing rather then him being passed from one short-term foster placement to another.
He said workload pressures and structural changes in the social work department had distracted workers from the case.
The inquiry, which is being held in Motherwell before Sheriff David Bicket, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article