A CHURCH youth leader has reacted with horror to the suggestion he might have been responsible for killing Elaine Doyle, 27 years ago.
But, a trial heard, two incidents involving young females had put retired plumber Alan Gray's name on a list of possible suspects.
The High Court in Edinburgh heard that just two weeks after Ms Doyle's murder Mr Gray, 67, was quizzed about an incident involving a young girl on a bike - which led to him appearing in sheriff court.
Mr Gray said although he had admitted an offence in court he wished now that he had challenged it. He said the reason he had opened his trouser zip was because of a medical condition which caused intense itching.
Mr Gray - at the time a member of Ardgowan Square evangelical church - was confronted with a police statement about another incident in August 1986.
"I saw a very attractive woman walking towards the town," the statement read.
Mr Gray, according to the statement, turned in a goods yard and went back to have another look.
Defence QC Donald Findlay challenged: "You go, basically, out of your way to ogle her and that is what you did, isn't it?" Mr Gray hesitated, then agreed.
The lawyer said: "These two things are why you would not be entirely surprised when police told you your name was on a special defence of incrimination."
Mr Findlay asked Mr Gray: "What if you had been out, for whatever reason, on the night of June 1 going into June 2 in your car and had seen a young girl walking on the road, alone, late at night, a girl called Elaine Doyle?
"What might have happened?" Mr Gray insisted: "Nothing."
On trial is John Docherty, 49, who denies murdering Ms Doyle. The special defence of incrimination is a list of 41 possible suspects.
Docherty, of Hunters' Quay Holiday Village, Dunoon, claims at the time he is alleged to have stripped and strangled Ms Doyle he was with his parents - who are no longer alive - at their home.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article