DNA analysis shows a man accused of murdering two teenage girls 37 years ago had touched "most if not all" of the ligatures used to tie them up, a court has heard.
Angus Sinclair, 69, denies raping and murdering Christine Eadie and Helen Scott, both 17, who were last seen at the World's End pub in Edinburgh on October 15, 1977. He is accused of carrying out the attacks along with his brother-in-law Gordon Hamilton, who is now dead.
Forensic scientist Geraldine Davidson told the High Court in Livingston that around 125 stains on the pieces of clothing used to restrain the girls had been examined during at least two years of "extensive, meticulous" testing.
Giving evidence for a fifth day, she told the jury: "The amount of DNA testing carried out in this case went beyond anything you would normally do."
Ms Davidson said: "The findings provide extremely strong support for the view that Gordon Hamilton and/or Angus Sinclair were involved in restraining and strangling both Helen Scott and Christine Eadie rather than any unknown and undetected individual."
Jurors have heard a defence report detailing Sinclair's version of events, in which he said he had "consensual sexual intercourse" with both girls in a vehicle in Holyrood Park and later left to go fishing.
He claimed the girls were "alive and unharmed" when he left them.
Ms Davidson told the court that the DNA findings supported the assertion that Hamilton had sexual intercourse with both girls, while Sinclair was involved in "sexual activity" with Helen.
She has spent much of her time in the witness box talking the jury through DNA analysis of each of the ligatures that were used to tie up the girls.
Reading from her report, the witness said: "In our opinion, the findings are fitting with our range of expectations had Gordon Hamilton and Angus Sinclair been in contact with most if not all of the ligatures examined in this case."
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article