The trial of a man accused of murdering two teenage girls 37 years ago has been delayed after several members of the jury fell ill.
Angus Sinclair, 69, denies raping and murdering Christine Eadie and Helen Scott, both 17, who were last seen at the World's End pub in Edinburgh on October 15 1977. He is accused of carrying out the attacks along with his brother-in-law, Gordon Hamilton, who is now dead.
Evidence in the trial at the High Court in Livingston was halted yesterday morning by Judge Lord Matthews after three jurors reported feeling unwell. The jury had been hearing from forensic scientist Geraldine Davidson.
She gave the court a report on DNA analysis carried out on the belt from Helen's raincoat, which had been used as a ligature around one of her wrists.
Ms Davidson, who was giving evidence for a fourth day, told the jury that the analysis suggested the two girls may have still been together when the ligature was tied.
She told the court that, in relation to one sample which had previously been part of a knot in the belt, there was "very strong support" for Sinclair to have contributed to the DNA found, and "moderately strong support" that Hamilton had also contributed.
Jurors have previously heard that Christine's body was found at around 2.25pm on October 16 1977 at Gosford Bay, Aberlady, and Helen's body was discovered at around 6pm that day in a field near Haddington in East Lothian.
The jury has heard a defence report detailing Sinclair's version of events, in which he said he had "consensual sexual intercourse" with both girls in a vehicle in Holyrood Park and later left to go fishing.
The trial continues today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article