OSCAR Pistorius should serve at least 10 years in prison for killing his girlfriend, the state prosecutor said at the close of the South African track star's sentencing hearing.
Judge Thokozile Masipa adjourned the session until Tuesday, when she is expected to sentence Pistorius and end a six-month, on-off trial that has captivated millions worldwide.
The 27-year-old Paralympic and Olympic athlete, whose lower legs were amputated when he was a baby, was convicted of culpable homicide last month for the shooting of 29-year-old law graduate and model Reeva Steenkamp.
"The minimum term that society will be happy with will be 10 years' imprisonment," chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel told the hearing. "This is a serious matter. The negligence borders on intent."
It was the first time prosecutors have said what sentence they are seeking for the double-amputee Olympic runner for shooting his girlfriend.
The defence and prosecution teams have spent much of the five-day sentencing hearing arguing over whether Pistorius should go to jail or be punished with house arrest and community service. A non-custodial sentence would be likely to spark public anger and fuel a perception among black South Africans that, 20 years after the end of white-minority apartheid rule, wealthy whites can still secure preferential justice.
"We shouldn't fail the parents. We shouldn't fail society. Society may lose its trust in the court," Mr Nel said, adding a house arrest sentence would be "shockingly disproportionate" to what Pistorius did in the pre-dawn hours of Valentine's Day last year when he shot four times through a toilet cubicle door in his home, killing his girlfriend.
Defence attorney Barry Roux earlier said the double-amputee sprinter should be given community service because he had shown remorse and been punished enough. Pistorius said he mistook Miss Steenkamp for an intruder.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article