The Justice Secretary has said abolishing the need for evidence in court cases to come from two sources will not help improve rape conviction rates.
However, Kenny MacAskill insisted it is "absolutely right" to do away with a centuries-old requirement for corroboration.
Other countries also had low conviction rates for sex offences, despite not having the requirement to have evidence from two separate sources, he pointed out.
"I am under no illusion that removing the requirement for corroboration will of itself solve the problem of Scotland's low conviction rate for rape. That is why we are working with all our partners to make sure victims of sexual crime have the confidence to come forward," he said.
Mr MacAskill was speaking at a Rape Crisis conference in Glasgow, at which a rape victim called for the requirement for corroboration to be removed from historic cases.
Colette Barrie, who was abused as a girl, waived her right to anonymity to speak out. The case against her abuser collapsed when a second victim decided not to give evidence, she said.
It was "crushing" when the case did not go to court, she said. "I was furious the need for corroboration robbed me of my chance to see him prosecuted. I wanted to tell my story to a jury and I wanted them to believe me. I wanted my abuser to be punished but, above all, I wanted him to know what he did was wrong."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article