JUDGES should be offered more opportunities to work part-time in a bid to increase applications from women, experts have said.
A steering group has also suggested that promoting role models, headhunting applicants and mentoring could be adopted to tackle barriers to the judiciary in Scotland experienced by minority groups.
Women make up only around a quarter of the judiciary in Scotland, with critics pointing out that the top legal roles are dominated by white, privately educated men.
The Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland (JABS), in partnership with the Judicial Office for Scotland, the Law Society of Scotland and Faculty of Advocates, has outlined a range of proposals aimed at redressing the balance following a conference examining the issue last year.
Sir Muir Russell, chairing member of the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland, said: "Everyone agrees that judicial appointments should be made on merit.
"However we know that there is increasing importance placed on diversity of representation, not just in employment but on the boards of companies and in public appointments.
"We set out to examine what, if anything, should be done to increase diversity in judicial appointments at our conference last year. Today's report highlights the issues raised at the conference and provides an excellent platform for further discussions with individuals and organisations. We are keen to get feedback on the report and about the areas of work we should undertake to help increase diversity.
"It is essential that our judges are respected for fairness and justice in their decision making, regardless of their gender or background.
"That said, we believe that we need to tackle existing barriers, whether real or perceived, and consider what can be done to encourage a wider pool of candidates to consider applying for judicial posts."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article