A WOMAN who gave evidence at the trial of two nuns accused of abusing girls after seeing media coverage, told a court the approved school they worked at set her on the right track.
Helen Lynass, 59, got in touch with the QC for Anne Kenny, known as Mother Rosaria at Dalbeath approved school, after being "shocked" at what she heard on the news.
She said she was a "rebel" who would not listen to anybody when she was sent there in the 1960s but she "listened to Mother Rosaria".
The mother-of-four claimed she saw no corporal punishment being used and said if it had happened it would have been spoken about.
Mrs Lynass, from Clydebank, was giving evidence at Paisley Sheriff Court at the trial of Anne Kenny, 79, and Agnes Reville, 77, known as Mother Martin.
Kenny, who was headmistress at the school from 1966 until the early 1970s, faces three charges of assault while Reville is accused of four charges of assault at the school in Bishopton.
Defence QC for Kenny, Ronnie Clancy asked: "Can you tell us how you came to be a witness in this case."
Mrs Lynass replied: "The news came on and I heard Mother Rosaria mentioned - That's when I heard what was happening. I spoke to my son, a police officer, and he said I had to contact someone involved in the case."
Mrs Lynass said she had not told any of her family she had been at Dalbeath but added: "I think my time at Dalbeath was probably what made me who I am. I listened to Mother Rosaria and I got set on the right track."
Under cross-examination by procurator-fiscal depute Douglas Hamilton she denied seeking attention. She said: "Do you think for a minute, after 40 years, I want my family knowing all this?"
Kenny and Reville deny the charges. The trial before sheriff Susan Sinclair continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article