THOUSANDS of Scottish pupils are protesting over one of this year's school exams arguing it was too hard.
More than 20,000 people have signed a petition raising concerns about the National 5 mathematics exams.
The move comes just days after pupils raised a petition complaining about the Higher English exam which had to be changed.
The latest petition claims the first of the two maths papers differed greatly from past and practice papers provided by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA).
The signatories on change.org are demanding the SQA lower the pass mark after pupils were left shocked by unexpected content in the exam paper.
The petition states: "Pupils across Scotland were shocked at the difficulty of their National 5 mathematics paper 1. This paper was unusually hard and was unlike anything seen in past papers and specimen papers provided by the SQA."
One comment on the petition reads: “My daughter was in tears. Even the teachers were shocked at how hard this paper was.”
Another, by an Edinburgh pupil, described the exam as "absolutely dreadful" while a third commented: "The SQA often retort that lower ability pupils struggle due to a lack of effort.
"I am a pupil who achieved 99 per cent in my prelim and 100 per cent in my second prelim and I found this paper foreign and very difficult to approach today. With all due respect, grade boundaries simply have to be diminished."
Last year, a similar petition on the Higher Maths exam was followed by the SQA admitting one of the questions was too hard.
However, a spokesman for the SQA said: "We are confident the National 5 maths exam provided candidates with a fair opportunity to show their understanding of the subject. It was designed in line with past and exemplar papers and according to our course and assessment specifications.
"We know the exams period can be a stressful time for young people and their families and are aware of the concerns which have been raised."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel