FLAGSHIP moves to give more funding direct to Scottish headteachers has been dismissed as “populist” by a leading official.
The accusation came after the Scottish Government announced moves to give legal responsibilities for raising standards to schools as part of a new delivery plan for education.
The proposals will also see millions of pounds of funding given directly to headteachers as well as the setting up of education regions to “decentralise management”.
John Swinney, the Education Secretary, said the intention was to drive improvements by allowing more decisions to be made by schools who were best placed to know what their communities needed.
However, Maureen McKenna, director of education for Glasgow City Council and president of the Association of Directors of Education, said local authorities performed a vital role.
She said: “My whole thrust over the past eight years has been to empower schools to deliver for their own communities and we hold them to account.
“I’ve seen heads who have not been coping at all. One is now a class teacher, one is a depute and one we sacked - who is going to do that?
“We should be putting our efforts into working together to improve these inconsistencies rather than jumping to a populist solution of giving money to schools because they are really good.”
However, Mr Swinney questioned whether all local authorities had the capacity or quality of leadership to effectively deliver education and called for greater collaboration.
Crucially, he also appeared to rule out the complete removal of schools from council control saying he was committed to a public education system “under democratic control”.
He said: “Does each authority have the capacity and capability to deliver the type of educational policy that we require in our schools?
“Is there enough quality of leadership to handle these issues? Does that exist universally across all the authorities? These are some questions we have got to explore to determine if we have all the arrangements necessary in place.
“I’ve spent many years as finance secretary trying to encourage people to work more collaboratively and to break down boundaries. At a time when resources are getting tight and where we clearly need to focus on improving outcomes, one thing that has frustrated me is the pace of development.”
Mr Swinney told the Times Education Supplement Scotland schools needed to be in greater control “because they will be the best judges of the needs of young people”.
Meanwhile, the Educational Institute of Scotland issued a fresh warning over the proposals to bypass councils after research from England.
The Education Policy Institute produced a league table which found academy trusts are no better than local authorities at raising school standards.
David Laws, former schools minister and the institute’s chairman, said successive governments had been “in denial” about failing academies while the Local Government Association said it showed academies were no “magic bullet” for improving schools.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said: “Contrary to the claims of the UK government, this research confirms that the academisation programme of removing schools from local authority control neither raises standards nor enhances the educational experience of pupils.
“Although the Scottish Government has not gone down the academy route, it is considering changes to the role that Scotland’s councils play in the running of our schools.
“This research evidences the fact that removing schools from local authority control is not the answer in terms of raising standards and addressing the impact of poverty.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel