UNIVERSITIES and schools should work in partnership to help primary pupils and their parents see higher education as a viable future option, Scotland’s fair access commissioner has said.
A number of institutions including Strathclyde, Glasgow Caledonian and Queen Margaret currently run programmes with primary pupils, but Professor Sir Peter Scott said work in primary could be expanded.
In particular, Sir Peter argues that training of primary teachers – which is delivered by universities – could include more work on widening access.
He said: “I’m not sure we make the connection between fair access agendas and the fact universities are responsible for training school teachers.
“I don’t know how much focus there is on issues of widening access and motivating a broad section of pupils, particularly in primary school, but it is a massive advantage that universities have in that they are responsible for training school teachers and they are a key group in shaping attitudes.
“An awful lot of teachers are typically from more advantaged backgrounds, so sometimes they need to understand what it is like for kids to have been less successful in education than they have.”
Sir Peter said work to support pupils in the upper years of secondary was crucial, but would only ever have a limited impact.
He added: “Intervening in the later years of secondary education is picking up people who are not quite going to make the grade because they have suffered various forms of disadvantage, but they are pretty well motivated and it doesn’t take a great deal to get them over the line.
“Unfortunately, there has been a lot of selecting people out before that of those who don’t have that level of motivation.
“If you are a middle-class pupil you don’t have to be that motivated because parents and teachers will do it for you and it is a natural progression to go to university.
“People from backgrounds less familiar to higher education don’t see it like that and don’t have that natural support.”
Sir Peter said primary school parents should be alerted to the possibilities of higher education for their children.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel