SCOTLAND'S smallest secondary school is to close after the narrowest of votes by councillors decided its fate.
Skerries School secondary department in Shetland, which has just three pupils and offers education from seniors one to four.
Closure will mean the pupils will be faced with a 90-minute ferry crossing to Vidlin on the Shetland mainland, then a 30-minute bus journey 23 miles to Lerwick. So they will have to board five days a week.
Skerries can be saved only if the Scottish Government intervenes. Education Secretary Michael Russell has six weeks to decide whether to call in the proposal to close the school and send the pupils to Anderson High, Lerwick, next summer.
Shetland Islands Council made the decision on the casting vote of convener Malcolm Bell after a two-and-a-half hour meeting ended in a 10-10 vote. Half the members supported closure and half backed a compromise of reducing it to a two-year school.
On Tuesday the Education And Families Committee had voted to proceed with the closure, but again only on a casting vote, by chairwoman Vaila Wishart.
At the full council meeting yesterday she said the secondary pupils at Skerries were being denied "access to a larger peer group of the same age and gender". "When it comes to health and wellbeing they need the opportunity to make friends and be part of a group in a range of situations," she said.
But North Isles councillor Gary Cleaver said shutting the school would remove parental choice. "We force people to put up and shut up, or move," he said. "I don't think that is a good option."
A majority of the 70 islanders oppose the closure. But the council has approved a plan that seeks saving of £3.268 million from education between 2013-18. Closing Skerries would achieve savings of £73,473 a year.
There is a fear that if the school closes it will herald depopulation. But councillors were told by their education officials that teaching such small numbers of pupils together did not offer them the best possible educational opportunities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article