MORE than two third of Scottish councils are prepared to sign up to a controversial deal to protect teacher numbers.
It is understood more than 20 of the country's 32 local authorities have agreed in principle to protect the number of teachers they employ in return for additional funding.
Cosla, the umbrella body for councils, has vociferously opposed the policy and took the first steps towards legal action last week.
However, if councils sign up to the offer from Finance Secretary John Swinney any threat of legal action would be significantly weakened.
The row erupted earlier this month after Mr Swinney blamed local authorities for breaking an SNP promise on teacher numbers, which have dropped dramatically since 2007.
The party has placed the retention of teachers at the heart of its education policy, but councils argue the number of teachers has no direct correlation to educational standards.
In a separate development, the Scottish Government used a debate in the Scottish Parliament on education to announce the first seven local authorities to benefit from a new £100 million fund to help close the attainment gap.
Glasgow, Dundee, Inverclyde, West Dunbartonshire, North Ayrshire, Clackmannanshire and North Lanarkshire will receive money from the Scottish Attainment Challenge fund for projects which help pupils in the most disadvantaged areas.
Angela Constance, the Education Secretary, also told the Scottish Parliament a new £500,000 fund would support a National Mentoring Scheme to improve the lives of looked after children.
The moves come after research has repeatedly highlighted the stark educational differences between pupils who grow up in affluent backgrounds and their counterparts in deprived areas.
A report last year from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation calculated the difference in reading attainment between children from low income and high-income households was already 13 months by the time they were aged five.
Ms Constance said: "The fund will be directed specifically to improve literacy, numeracy, health and wellbeing in primary schools because if we can close the attainment gap when children are young the benefits will continue into secondary school and beyond.
"There will be a bespoke improvement plan and access to resources and expertise in each area and we will measure improvement rigorously and ensure that lessons are learned nationally about what works and what doesn't."
While the funding was welcomed by MSPs during the Holyrood debate, Scottish Labour called for a doubling of the amount of money being invested.
Iain Gray, the party's education spokesman, called on the Scottish Government to back his party's plans for a further £25m per year programme of investment paid for through a 50p top rate of tax.
He said: "The gap associated with poverty and deprivation in local authority areas appears to be very wide. This is the not-so-secret shame of Scotland's schools that who you are and how much your parents earn will define your educational attainment and your life chances more than anything else.
"We are certainly willing to give the attainment fund a fair wind, but we simply believe that we need to do yet more and that we can."
The Scottish Conservatives called for ministers to consider the introduction of recent educational policies from England which have seen the setting up of academies and free schools which are not under council control.
Liz Smith, the party's education spokeswoman, said: "It simply cannot be right that pupils who come from poorer backgrounds have far less chance of getting good quality passes in national exams than their counterparts from better off areas.
"If it is proven that academies or free schools do provide better results for those children from poorer backgrounds, the SNP should set aside its political ideology and consider this approach."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article