PUPILS from a Scottish primary will have dance and drama classes in the school car park under controversial proposals to alleviate overcrowding.
Glasgow City Council has suggested the conversion of part of an underground car park at Hillhead Primary School, in the city's west end, to deal with a chronic shortage of space.
A report by the council said the plan had been criticised by parents, but was being considered because other alternatives were proving equally unpopular.
Officials had previously proposed closing a nursery attached to the school to create more classroom space and also suggested sending pupils in the final year of primary to nearby Hillhead Secondary School.
However, the council is now recommending that neither of these options is taken forward and that a new general purposes classroom should be built in the car park.
The recommendations also include making the Hillhead catchment area smaller and capping rolls next year - although that will mean some children who currently live in the catchment area will not be able to secure a place at the school next summer.
The council report states: "Council officers had discussed a proposal.... in relation to creating additional space by using an area of the underground car park at Hillhead.
"Concerns.... were raised over the lack of natural light, proximity to vehicular traffic and that children would have to leave the main school building.... to gain access to the underground car park.
"However, officers have reviewed this option in light of the strong opposition to both the closure of Kelvin Park Early Years Centre and the potential use of
space within Hillhead High School."
The report says the car park option is now "viewed as viable" adding: "If approved the design team would be tasked with providing the most suitable artificial lighting, separating pedestrian and vehicular access and putting in place protocols for movement between the main school building and the learning area within the current car park."
Sarah Lowndes, a spokeswoman for the Space For Hillhead campaign, attacked the latest proposals.
She said: "Effectively the council has decided to prioritise the 79 places provided by their flagship nursery over the needs of the 682 children enrolled in the school."
"If the council proceeds with this new proposal they will be failing a whole generation of primary school pupils, who, unlike the children from the early years centre, will be stuck in an overcrowded school for seven years."
However, Kate Cotter, from the Keep Kelvin Early Years campaign, welcomed the recommendations.
She said: "We do understand there are capacity issues at the school, but are pleased to see that these are being addressed without recourse to the nuclear option of closing the centre.
"This has been a very intense period for parents on all sides of the debate and we hope that all parents can now turn their attention to continuing to support both school and nursery in providing a first class education."
A letter to parents from Maureen McKenna, the council's director of education, said: "These recommendations are founded on the desire to address the issue of flexible-space within Hillhead Primary School whilst ensuring that all children and young people in all the schools and the Early Years Centre have the best possible learning opportunities and facilities."
A council spokeswoman added: "We have listened to all interested parties during the consultation. The original proposals and plans have been adapted to reflect the diverse and varying views."
Under the wider council proposals, catchment area changes would affect Oakgrove, Anderston, Garnetbank, Hyndland and Thornwood Primary Schools.
Hillhead, in Otago Street, was opened three years ago following a merger with other primary schools and was designed for 632 pupils.
It currently has around 680 pupils and the school's dedicated art room and music room have already become classrooms, as has its library.
The consultation document will go before councillors in January with a final decision taken by the council's executive committee.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article