TENS of thousands of pupils across Scotland will today celebrate record pass rates in their school exams.
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) said pass rates at Standard Grade, Higher and Advanced Higher all reached their best-ever levels.
While the results will lead to joy for many pupils, the rising pass rates have prompted fresh concern that qualifications are being "dumbed down".
Exam results for 2012, which will be received through the post by 158,908 candidates this morning, showed the pass rate for Higher has increased by 1.8 per-centage points since last year to nearly 77% – the sixth year in a row it has risen.
The pass rate for Advanced Higher has climbed to 80.1%, while the pass rate for Standard Grade now stands at 98.9%.
Liz Smith, Scottish Conservative education spokeswoman, congratulated pupils and teachers, but said future reform of the exam system should ensure "academic rigour".
She added: "I am very aware of the public suspicion that there has been some dumbing down in certain aspects of the exam system.
"Employers especially find it hard to understand how there can be a continuous rate of improvement every year in all the overall pass-rates, both north and south of the Border, when they are also finding there is a lack of knowledge and basic skills among new recruits."
The Scottish Government and teaching unions leapt to the defence of the school system.
Michael Russell, the Education Secretary, said: "I am delighted with these results and would like to extend my congratulations to our school pupils and their teachers on another year of high achievement.
"These results are a reflection of the hard work and dedication they have shown across a number of months and their success is hugely merited. To suggest otherwise would belittle the next generation of ambitious young Scots."
Dr Janet Brown, SQA's chief executive, said pass rate rise reflected the value placed on qualifications, particularly in a difficult economic climate.
A spokesman for the Educational Institute of Scotland said it was normal for exam results to fluctuate from year to year.
He added: "This year's results show Scotland's qualifications framework remains robust, and continues to support Scottish education and allow pupils to earn certificates that are valued by employers and further and higher education providers."
Ann Ballinger, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers Association, insisted recent increases reflected growing familiarity with the courses and exams by teachers. She said: "It takes some time to become familiar with the courses, which in some cases have changed quite considerably, and that is why you see exam results improve in this way."
Neil Findlay, Scottish Labour's learning and skills spokesman, added: "I'm delighted so many of our young people have again excelled themselves at exams at all levels and it is a testament to all the hard work by pupils, parents and teachers alike."
One pass rate to fall was for the Scottish Baccalaureate exams, where 79.1% passed compared to more than 80% last year. There was also little evidence that such exams were growing in popularity with just a small increase in uptake from 174 entries to 182.
A revision of science exams at Higher was also snubbed by many schools. The SQA revamped Highers in biology, chemistry, human biology and physics to reflect significant changes in the field of science.
However, schools still had the option of taking the traditional exams and 33,431 pupils took existing courses compared to the 810 who moved to the new qualifications.
This year also saw an increase in the number of candidates taking subjects in Gaelic, including Standard Grade history and geography and Higher maths.
In Glasgow, the proportion of pupils achieving five or more Highers rose from 6.5% last year to 7.5% while the number achieving three or more Highers increased from 16.3% to 17.9%.
Stephen Curran, the council's executive member for education, said: "We made a commitment to raise the attainment and aspirations of our young people and these results prove we are achieving this."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article