EXAM bosses have been urged to reduce the amount of testing in schools as part of moves to tackle the workload crisis facing teachers.
An independent report into the introduction of new National qualifications this summer found there had been a "significant and unsustainable" level of over‑assessment in schools.
The review, commissioned by the Scottish Government, concluded: "This increase in assessment was not intended and requires to be addressed at both national and local level."
The report was welcomed by Michael Russell, the education secretary, who has written to schools highlighting the need for change. His letter states: "It is vital we learn from our experiences. The national education bodies are already taking steps to implement these recommendations and will continue to support teachers and schools throughout the year ahead."
However, Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union, described the report as "shallow" because it did not blame the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) for the problems.
He said: "The glaring weakness in the report is the shallow analysis of the experience of the past session. EIS members were very clear the SQA had failed to deliver the level of support which schools needed.
"Late changes to assessments, poor communication and lack of professional support have contributed greatly to the workload pressures experienced in schools."
The report, by Kenneth Muir, chief executive of the General Teaching Council of Scotland, called on the SQA to review the amount of assessment in schools and the administrative burden on teachers. Councils and senior education officials have been urged to ensure teachers get better classroom support.
The report says schools should be more flexible about when pupils take exams, in line with the aims of the new Curriculum for Excellence. Schools and teachers have been asked to collect "appropriate and proportionate" assessment evidence to minimise pressures on pupils.
Mr Muir said: "Introducing new qualifications is always a complex, time consuming and challenging process. What is important is that we continue to learn from issues that arise and build on the good practice seen in introducing... the new qualifications."
Iain Ellis, chairman of the National Parent Forum for Scotland, said: "We need to learn from the experience of last year and make changes where necessary."
Earlier this month, the National exams, which replaced Standard Grades, were hailed a success with pass rates on a par with similar exams in recent years. However, the exams followed a year of turmoil in schools with surveys highlighting high levels of teacher stress.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article