PUPILS who sat controversial new school exams earlier this year faced a "relentless" and "overwhelming" workload, a national parents' group has said.
The National Parent Forum of Scotland warned that National 5 qualifications - which replaced Standard Grade - had involved a "mountain of content" in some of the subjects.
The comments come in a written submission to the Scottish Parliament's education committee, which is today taking evidence from Michael Russell, the Education Secretary, on the introduction of the new exams, which are part of the wider Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) reforms.
The submission states: "The view from parents was that schools were taking very different approaches and there were few signs of convergence around a preferred model.
"Some schools seemed organised and confident.... while others seemed on the back foot with stressed and unsure teachers failing to provide reassurance or credible information."
The body also attacked Holyrood's education committee for failing to invite parents' groups to give evidence to their inquiry into the implementation of CfE. The implementation was also criticised by the Royal Society of Edinburgh in a separate submission to the Holyrood committee.
The submission said: "CfE has suffered profoundly from a lack of pilot trials and independent evaluation.
"In this context, we are particularly concerned about inadequate attention having been given to the design and implementation of the assessment strategy.
"While we recognise that additional support has been provided.... we have been concerned at the reactive nature of these developments."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article