MINISTERS have been accused of reneging on their responsibilities to pupils with special needs after a legal ruling which has severe ramifications for youngsters with conditions such as autism.
The ruling threatens to erode the rights of thousands of parents whose children have disabilities.
The Scottish Government introduced co-ordinated support plans (CSP) for pupils with additional support needs to set the levels of support they could expect from their local council.
However, the status of the plans was thrown into confusion after a court ruled last month that there was no requirement for councils to provide such support - even if it was detailed in the plan.
Following the case, a group of charities, including education provider Spark of Genius, wrote to the Scottish Government under the banner of the Scottish Children's Services Coalition.
They urged the Government it to amend the Additional Support for Learning Act and its associated code of practice.
But the response from Alasdair Allan, Minister for Learning, said it was not appropriate for ministers to comment on a decision made by a tribunal "as it would be construed as an act of interference with judicial independence."
A spokesman for the coalition group said: "It appears the Scottish Government is dodging the issue as this provides no reassurance on the status of the CSP and still leaves considerable dubiety over it.
"While it makes clear the legislation makes a significant contribution to the delivery of support, it fails to provide a clear answer over the statutory status of a CSP.
"We, as will many of those with children and young people we work with, share a concern that the CSP is hardly worth the paper it is written on and is not the guarantee of support they thought it to be."
The case centres on nine-year-old autistic pupil Thomas Lloyd, who was given a co-ordinated support plan (CSP) by Glasgow City Council, which said he would receive weekly speech and language therapy to help his communication.
Despite the contents of the CSP, Thomas was not given therapy when he attended St Kevin's special school in Springburn last year, and his family, from Broomhill in the city's west end, took the case to a tribunal.
At the hearing, the council successfully argued there was no requirement to provide the support because the pupil did not need it, despite the fact it was expressly detailed in his CSP.
In the wake of the ruling, Iain Nisbet, a solicitor with the Education Law Unit at Govan Law Centre, which handled the case, said it threatened the rights of all parents with a CSP because, if correct, it meant a CSP was effectively unenforceable.
Mr Nisbet said yesterday: "We are encouraged by the Scottish Government's position on the legally binding nature of the CSP in the letter from the minister to the coalition.
"However, while a single tribunal decision does not set any kind of precedent, we would urge ministers to take the opportunity to clarify the position and set parents' minds at ease by amending the Act or the Code of Practice."
The Scottish Children's Services Coalition comprises a number of education providers and charities including Mindroom, Spark of Genius, Who Cares? Scotland, Falkland House School and Young Foundations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article