A FLAGSHIP qualification aimed at broadening the study of Scottish history, geography, culture and literature has failed to spark the interest of pupils, according to new figures.
Statistics show only 159 pupils sat Scottish Studies in its first year, despite the subject being promoted heavily by the Scottish Government.
The poor take-up has now sparked calls for the subject to be made mandatory by a leading member of the Association for Scottish Literary Studies.
John Hodgart, a member of the working group which developed Scottish Studies, said the initial take-up was "very disappointing".
"Even though it was the first year it was disappointing and there are areas and schools where its importance and relevance has not been identified," he said.
"Teachers have even asked me what is it because they haven't really come across it and we need to ask how important this is for the education of Scottish children.
"The perception seems to be that it is an optional extra, but this is not an add-on. Children have to learn about their own culture, but I don't see any signs of that immediately.
"I feel there should be a mandatory element of some kind to ensure that children naturally learn about their history and culture as they grow up."
Neil McLennan, another member of the working group, said: "There was always going to be a challenge for Scottish Studies, given the reduced number of subjects that many schools opt for in the new National qualifications."
However, James Robertson, a Scottish novelist and champion of the Scots language, said he expected take-up for Scottish Studies to "greatly increase" in 2014/15 as teachers gained confidence in the subject and more resources became available.
He said: "The opposition in some quarters of the education sector to any specific Scottish Studies has been quite strong, so it is essential that such courses and units win converts and are taken up by teachers and students on their merits, not because they are being pushed for ideological reasons."
In 2012, it was revealed all pupils would be expected to learn about their heritage through the new subject of Scottish Studies, with Michael Russell, the former Education Secretary, saying he wanted to create a new subject because teaching had become too "fragmented".
In a later interview, Dr Alasdair Allan, the SNP's Minister for Learning and Skills, said he was not interested in creating a subject to which only some pupils had access.
However, in March 2012 the Scottish Studies working group recommended there should not be a discrete course for Scottish Studies and it was instead left to the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) to develop awards at three different levels.
SQA exam statistics for this summer show only four pupils took up the subject at the lower level, 65 sat it at the middle level and 90 pupils took it at the highest level.
Scottish Studies was launched in 2013/14 with the SNP government arguing that it would improve young people's appreciation of Scotland's distinct culture, history and languages. However, opponents criticised the idea as "brainwashing".
An SQA spokeswoman said: "New qualifications tend to have low uptake initially and we expect these figures to increase over time as more centres start to deliver it."
The General Teaching Council for Scotland has also introduced into its new guidelines for trainee teachers a requirement that they should develop awareness of how the study of Scottish culture can be developed within the curriculum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article