A FLAGSHIP Scottish Government qualification designed to increase participation in sciences and languages has failed to spark the interest of pupils.
New figures show the take-up of two key Scottish Baccalaureates has fallen over the past year, despite efforts to raise their profile in schools and universities.
This year, just 32 pupils took the languages baccalaureate, down from 34 the previous year, and only 142 completed the science qualification, a reduction from 148 in 2012.
There was also very little interest in two new baccalaureates in the expressive arts and social sciences, with just five pupils sitting the former and 12 the latter.
Eileen Prior, executive director of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said the qualifications did not have the same level of appeal as Highers and Advanced Highers.
She said: "It would seem something is going awry. Either it is not being embraced at school level or schools are not being successful in inspiring young people to take the opportunity.
"We hear little from parents about the baccalaureate and it would seem schools and universities will have to do much more to promote the qualification to youngsters and their families."
A spokesman for the EIS teaching union said there were still issues over equality of access to the programme.
However, a Scottish Government spokesman argued baccalaureates were now getting recognition from universities in their prospectuses.
He added: "Designed to meet the needs of only our most able learners, the baccalaureate will never be a mass market qualification. The Scottish Qualifications Authority is working with schools to promote the enhanced skills which it develops."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article