LARGE pay rises for Scottish university principals have been criticised by the country's Education Secretary.
Michael Russell told the Scottish Parliament the salary increases - revealed by The Herald earlier this week - should be in step with what other staff were being offered.
Mr Russell was responding to concerns raised by Labour MSP Ken Macintosh after figures showed almost half of Scotland's university principals took increases above inflation. One was as high as 24%, although others accepted no rise or just 1%.
The controversy comes at a time when university and college staff are taking industrial action over a 1% pay offer for last year.
Mr Russell said: "I do not support or endorse what has happened.
"If principals, as they do from time to time, ask for my private advice on what they should do, my advice is unequivocal - they should do what ministers in the Scottish Government have done, they should do what has been done right across the public sector, they should make sure they show restraint and leadership.
"They certainly should not allow themselves to be awarded pay increases massively out of step of those salary terms and conditions that are being offered to their staff. I can't be any clearer than that."
Mr Macintosh said people were outraged by the large pay increases.
He said: "To hear Mr Russell's private advice when we're talking about public funds is not acceptable to this Parliament.
"This is a public matter. We're talking about half a billion pounds of public money going to these institutions."
However, Labour should table plans to "nationalise" universities if they want ministerial intervention, Mr Russell suggested.
On Monday, Scottish university principals were accused of hypocrisy and greed after figures showed nearly half of them accepted inflation-busting pay rises last year.
Academics and student leaders called for legislation to restrict pay for senior managers in the sector after an average increase of more than 4% in 2012/13.
The figures show the largest rise was a 24% rise for Professor Steve Chapman from Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.
Mr Chapman accepted a £20,000 increase in his basic pay and a £20,000 bonus in 2012/13 to bring his overall salary package, excluding pensions contributions, to £210,000.
There has been a concerted drive in Scotland in recent years to obtain more clarity and accountability over the salaries of university principals, which has been resisted by institutions.
In 2012, a review of university governance chaired by Professor Ferdinand von Prondzynski, principal of Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, called for a number of changes, including the abolition of bonuses.
It also called for university remuneration committees that set the pay of principals to include members of staff and students to increase transparency.
However, a new code of governance published by a steering group of experts chaired by Lord Smith of Kelvin later dismissed the suggestion, arguing principals' pay should continue to be decided by the current remuneration set-up.
A spokeswoman for Universities Scotland, which represents principals, said: "We expect principals' salaries to come under intense scrutiny, but it's important to give the figures some context.
"Principals are in charge of multimillion-pound enterprises and responsible for many thousands of staff and students and hundreds of stakeholders. It is a complex and demanding job which commands a high salary."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article