SCOTTISH teachers have given overwhelming support to the prospect of industrial action over changes to their pensions.
More than 90% of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) members who voted in the consultative ballot backed taking action should talks with the Scottish Government fail to reach agreement.
However, before any industrial action takes place the EIS would have to conduct a formal ballot on strike action.
Teachers pay contributions of 6.4% of their salary to pensions but, under the proposals, staff on more than £15,000 a year would pay more.
However, it is the impact on school staff of having to work until they are 68 or later before receiving their full pension that has sparked the current row – with the EIS arguing it is inconceivable staff should be in the classroom as they approach 70.
The proposal is contained in the UK-wide Public Service Pension Bill, which links the retirement age of teachers to state pension age.
Leaders of other public sector staff, such as civil servants and doctors, have also pledged to campaign against the changes, along with teachers in England.
EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan said: “EIS members have given their overwhelming support to the principle of further industrial action in defence of their pensions.”
However, the Scottish Government said it had been forced to change pensions because of decisions at Westminster.
“We are required by the UK Government to implement the increases and, were we not to do so, HM Treasury would reduce the Scottish budget by an estimated £35 million every year for teachers’ pensions alone,” said a spokesman.
“We have been fully engaged in discussions with the teaching unions and recognise their concerns. We hope the EIS will continue their participation in the negotiation process but do not think that industrial action is in the best interests of pupils or parents.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article