WARNINGS have been issued over the Scottish Government's policy of concentrating research funding on traditional universities.
Lecturers and students have criticised cuts to the research budgets of newer universities, stating they could lead to a two-tier system of university education in Scotland.
The attack comes a week after Ferdinand von Prondzynski, principal of Robert Gordon University, in Aberdeen, said the move could undermine the Government's wider economic strategy.
In 2012/13, newer universities such as Abertay in Dundee, Edinburgh Napier, Glasgow Caledonian, Queen Margaret in Edinburgh, and Robert Gordon will all see a cut to their share of Scotland's research budget – an annual fund of £233 million.
At the same time, research investment at traditional universities such as Glasgow, Edinburgh and St Andrews will increase, in some cases by as much as 6%.
Mary Senior, Scottish official of the UCU, which represents lecturers, said: "We believe research funding should build a research base in all institutions, as the concept of research-based teaching is fundamental for the development of our universities.
"We are clear that the moves towards a two-tier system of research or teaching universities in Scotland undermines the concept of research-led teaching, and devalues the essential and very useful research that is pioneered in the newer universities such as Queen Margaret, Glasgow Caledonian and Robert Gordon."
Robin Parker, president of student body NUS Scotland, added: "We would be very concerned if research became too concentrated on only a few universities in Scotland.
"Students wouldn't accept a two-tier university system in Scotland, where older institutions receive almost all of public research funds, leaving our newer universities with little research activity.
"This would harm the student experience, and harm these institutions too. One of the things that make universities what they are is that they conduct research and link that to their teaching. This is a crucial core activity and so we would not accept any move away from this."
A spokesman for the Scottish Funding Council, which distributes research funding on behalf of the Government said: "We support research in all of Scotland's universities through the allocation of the Research Excellence Grant (REG).
"This funding underpins the research base in Scotland and is intended to help our universities to secure additional research support from the research councils, the major research charities, the European Commission and from business and industry."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are committed to maintaining Scotland's position as a world-leading research centre.
"Scottish universities regularly successfully compete for research funding from a range of sources, including from the EU and research councils.
"In addition, funding for the REG increased in 2012-13 by £10m to £223m."
Concentration of research funding was first highlighted in the Scottish Government's Green Paper on higher education, published in 2010.
This was followed up in September last year by a letter of guidance to the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) from Michael Russell, the Education Secretary, highlighting his priorities between 2012 and 2015.
He said: "To ensure Scotland's research remains internationally competitive, you should continue to focus on world- leading and internationally excellent research."
The SFC has now changed the way it allocates its REG, no longer funding lower-graded research and concentrating instead on work that ranks highest in international comparisons.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article