THE head of a leading Scottish university has attacked controversial new legislation that gives more power to ministers as threatening the "responsible autonomy" of institutions and opening them up to meddling from future governments.
Professor Sir Timothy O'Shea, principal of Edinburgh University, said a "principal anxiety" over the Post-16 Education (Scotland) Bill was the prospect of intervention by ministers.
Professor Seona Reid, director of Glasgow School of Art, also attacked the proposed legislation, saying it could be "misused".
The attacks came after Michael Russell, the Education Secretary, published the bill last year.
The legislation lets ministers set priorities for universities in return for their public funding – including ensuring institutions comply with new rules on governance and widening access.
It also gives the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), which administers public money on behalf of the Government, powers to review the provision of courses.
Giving evidence to the Scottish Parliament's Education Committee, which is scrutinising the legislation, Sir Timothy said the spirit of the bill was welcome, but highlighted a "principal anxiety".
"We are very supportive of the whole bill in terms of intentions with regards to widening participation, greater efficiency of the sector and greater accountability," he said. "At the same time, we are very aware that the Scottish universities are seen as being particularly successful, and the outside commentators relate that success to the responsible autonomy that we discharge.
"We are anxious that there may inadvertently be a potential reduction in responsible autonomy and that some future administration might be in a position to intervene in a way that would be unhelpful to the success of universities.
"Our anxiety is that if a future government were given the apparatus whereby it could intervene in our management or governance structures then it might choose to do so."
Ms Reid added: "The issue of a code of governance is something that all universities, of whatever size or nature, support absolutely wholeheartedly.
"But to enshrine it in legislation risks the possibility that for future administrations it could be misused to apply a uniformity of governance model that would be inappropriate to a diverse sector."
However, Labour learning and skills spokesman Neil Findlay challenged the concerns, suggesting conditions may have to be imposed to address the shortcomings of institutions that have "failed miserably" to widen access to their courses.
"I would suggest part of the reason why the Government is seeking to legislate is because of the approach that you are presenting to us today," he said.
"They feel that things haven't gone far enough, therefore they feel as though they are going to have to legislate."
Later, committee convener Stewart Maxwell quoted Tracey Slaven, from the Government's Bill team, who told the committee last week they are listening to the sector's concerns about "unintended consequences" of the bill.
Mr Maxwell said: "It sounds like they are certainly reconsidering their position. Is that your understanding?"
Sir Timothy said: "I met with Tracey Slaven yesterday and that was my exact understanding."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The Government is of course listening to all points of view during this process of pre-legislative scrutiny."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article