SCOTTISH children are at risk of hearing Chinese "propaganda" in schools, a human rights group has warned.
Free Tibet has accused councils of "nodding through" deals putting teachers controlled by China's ruling regime in to classrooms.
The campaign group believes cash-strapped local authorities unquestioningly accepted Chinese money - and influence - to pay for and carry out teaching they could not otherwise afford as part of so-called Confucius Classrooms.
It now fears a "whitewash" of serious issues in China, such as its continued occupation of Tibet.
Free Tibet has used Freedom of Information legislation to try and find evidence of any council having full scrutiny or debate about the impact of allowing teachers who toe party lines in to classrooms.
A spokesman said: "When the government of China is facilitating and paying for that, alarm bells should ring.
"Before we let an undemocratic, authoritarian, human rights-abusing regime into our classrooms to teach our children about the country it rules over, tough questions have to be asked.
"There needs to be proper, democratic scrutiny of a policy like that - instead, Scottish councils seem to have nodded it through with their eyes half-closed.
"There's almost no evidence from the information Free Tibet has received from councils of proper debate, consultation or oversight of the decision to open Confucius Classrooms in their schools.
"Nor, apparently, has there been debate about councils taking money from China's government and the conflict of interest that could represent. That debate needs to happen now."
Communist rulers in Beijing increasingly use funding for language lessons to boost their image, and "soft power" - overseas.
They have admitted they expect teachers - who they recruit and control - to toe the party line. This has led to some education authorities to either reject their advances or, like the school board in Toronto, Canada, pull out of deals.
Five universities around the world, concerned at what they see as a threat to academic freedom, have also shut so-called Confucius Institutes on their campuses.
Others universities and school authorities around the world have weighed up the issues and backed the institutes but in public debates almost entirely absent in Scotland.
Free Tibet is not attacking the teaching of Chinese - or educators who do so. In fact, it thinks Tibetans would benefit from more people from the democratic West understanding China and Chinese.
The group has offered to go to Scottish schools to talk about how the Chinese regime behaves in Tibet.
The spokesman said stressed no school wanted "to provide a platform for Chinese government propaganda". But he added: "There is a real risk of that happening by default unless schools take active steps to prevent it."
Scotland has 16 school "hubs" for Confucius Classrooms. They have 29 teachers provided by Chinese state agency Hanban.
This compares with just six native-language assistants in the whole of Scotland for German, the most spoken language in the European Union. The Confucius Classrooms are co-ordinated by the Confucius Institute for Scottish Schools or CISS, which is half-funded by China and based at Strathclyde University.
Some 20,000 children are said to have been exposed to some kind of Chinese teaching, mostly basic awareness classes. Around 100 people sat a higher in Chinese last year. Around 1000 sat German.
One of Scotland's leading language teaching experts, Dan Tierney of Strathclyde University, recently branded Chinese teaching as "less relevant" than basic European languages, such as German.
A spokesman for Strathclyde University: "The work of the Confucius Institute for Scotland's Schools promotes the learning of Mandarin in Scotland's schools and creates opportunities for children and young people to learn a language that is spoken by more than 1.3 billion people world-wide."
Glasgow City Council, which is host to a Confucius "hub", said it would respond to Free Tibet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article