ENVIRONMENTALISTS say they are shocked by the damage caused by unregulated hill tracks across landscapes and claim the worst examples amount to little more than vandalism.
The tracks have long been put in by sporting estates to help shooting parties while others have been created by farming and forestry interests, but they do not come under the planning system.
Nine organisations are now working together under Scottish Environment LINK and have invited Planning Minister Derek Mackay to join writer and broadcaster Cameron McNeish to inspect the damage they can cause.
Helen Todd, of Ramblers Scotland and co-convener of the campaign group, said: "Currently tracks can simply be bulldozed across the countryside almost anywhere in Scotland, and have caused huge visual and environmental damage in some of Scotland's finest landscapes."
Ms Todd said the Scottish Government recently dropped a proposal to bring hill tracks with purported "agricultural or forestry purposes" into the planning system.
Beryl Leatherland, of the Scottish Wild Land Group and co-convener of the campaign group, said some tracks amounted to little more than "vandalism".
"We have seen evidence of tracks being bulldozed across some of the country's most iconic landscapes without any care for their design or impact," she said.
But Douglas McAdam, CEO of Scottish Land & Estates which represents 2500 landowners and managers, said the issue of hill tracks had been the subject the subject of a full consultation by the Scottish Government less than a year ago.
Mr McAdam said the hill tracks provide the likes of farmers, gamekeepers, deer managers and other land managers vital access for their work.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said Mr Mackay was considering the invitation to meet Mr McNeish.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article