THE sand dunes on a beach in the north of Scotland are retreating by up to five feet a year and protective measures are urgently needed, according to a scientific study.
The study says Golspie beach in Sutherland should have the type of defensive work successfully carried out in other places such as St Andrews, with a new ridge and gravel and boulders brought in to protect the coastline from further losses.
It found that the upper beach in the northern section at Golspie had eroded at an average rate of up to 3.28ft a year, and the southern section had retreated at an average rate up to 4.92ft a year.
Scottish Natural Heritage, which commissioned the paper, said the erosion was due to rising sea levels as a result of climate change and other factors.
Man-made hard coastal defences further up the coast from Golspie have reduced the supply of natural materials to the area to help combat the effects, the study said.
The work was carried out by Dr Jim Hansom and James Fitton of the University of Glasgow's department of geographical and earth sciences, who went back 134 years in their investigations. They studied historical OS maps dating from 1879, 1907 and 1971 augmented by aerial photography and ground survey from 2013.
The researchers recommended using aggregate, known as 'beach feeding', as a low-cost and effective way to manage erosion and flood risk at key points of the coast.
Dr Hansom said: "Beach feeding would provide natural beach material to the eroded sections by working with natural processes, rather than against them, to mitigate future erosion and flood risk."
He said the supplied material should be mainly coarse gravels and boulders from gravel ridges of the Golspie spit, nearby commercial quarries, or recycled from the beaches to the south.
The paper was commissioned after a storm that affected much of the east coast in December 2012.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article