SERIOUS concerns have been raised over the future of green energy projects in the Western Isles following the decision of a developer to pull out of a £200 million turbine scheme.
The French energy giant GDF Suez blames delays in the laying of a subsea cable required to carry electricity to the mainland for its decision to walk away from the planned 39-turbine project on the Eisgein Estate in the southeast of Lewis.
Work on the scheme, which would power 100,000 homes and generate £1 million a year in community benefit, was expected to begin last year.
GDF Suez, along with other developers, had been expected to underwrite the £750m cost of the cable without which hopes of transforming the Western Isles economy through the generation of green energy will be dashed.
Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission, part of power giant SSE, estimates it will be 2019 before the cable is laid.
Angus Campbell, leader of Western Isles Council, has been lobbying for the interconnector for years. He said: "This is a blow for the renewables industry in the Western Isles."
But he added: "There are still huge opportunities in renewable development in the islands and I hope a successor company can be found for the Eishken project. Our aim would be to maximise the community ownership element of such a company."
Michael Rieley, of the industry body Scottish Renewables, said: "We need to see meaningful regulatory and policy change to enable these vital connections. Without these necessary grid connections, Scottish islands, like Lewis, will be unable to realise their renewable electricity potential."
A spokeswoman for SSE said: "It is widely recognised that there are a number of outstanding issues of a policy and regulatory nature which continue to affect the development of renewables on the islands, including the Western Isles.
"The Scottish Islands Renewables Delivery Forum, which is co-chaired by the UK and Scottish Governments, is seeking to address the outstanding issues."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article