Common misconceptions about frozen food are contributing to the seven million tonnes of waste thrown out by UK households every year, a survey suggests.
A poll for the Food Standards Agency (FSA) revealed widespread confusion around the safety of frozen food as households waste the equivalent of about six meals a week.
Some 43 per cent of people think food should only be frozen on the day of purchase, rather than up until the use-by date, 38 per cent incorrectly said it is dangerous to refreeze meat after it has been cooked and more than a third (36 per cent) wrongly believe that food can become unsafe to eat while in the freezer.
Almost a quarter (23 per cent) said they would never freeze meat that was cooked after defrosting, with 73 per cent of them saying this was due to worries about food poisoning.
More than two thirds of those surveyed (68 per cent) had thrown food away in the past month, mainly bread (36 per cent), fruit (31 per cent), vegetables (31 per cent) and leftover meals (22 per cent).
The FSA, Defra and Wrap (Waste and Resources Action Programme) are reviewing the guidance provided to the food industry on date marking of food, including whether this should be expanded to cover food storage and freezing advice for consumers.
FSA policy director Steve Wearne said: "The freezer is like a pause button, so you can freeze foods right up to the 'use by' date.
"While food is kept safe in the freezer, it's the quality that deteriorates over time, so we recommend eating it within three to six months and checking for any freezing instructions on the packaging.
"Once defrosted, the pause button is off, so defrost food as and when you need it and eat it within 24 hours of it being fully defrosted."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article