MORE money must be ploughed into brain tumour research to boost survival rates, a new report suggests.
Only one per cent of UK spending on cancer research goes on investigating brain tumours, despite the fact that one in 50 people who die under the age of 60 do so from a brain tumour, the report says.
The report from charity Brain Tumour Research, says there is a large discrepancy between research for this and other cancers.
It said that 55% of the national spend on site-specific cancer benefits sufferers from four cancers; breast, bowel and prostate cancers, and leukaemia.
The authors said there have been remarkable improvements in treatments and survival rates for patients diagnosed with these four diseases.
Almost half of patients with them survive for five years after diagnosis compared to 19 per cent of people with brain cancer.
"We know funding into brain tumours needs to increase to around £30 million to £35m a year over a ten-year time-frame. At the current rate of spend, it could take 100 years to find a cure," said Brain Tumour Research chief executive Sue Farrington Smith.
"We are also calling on the Government to introduce a national register of site-specific cancer research to track all research grants and research work, ensuring transparency of funding arrangements."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article