THE Commission on Assisted Dying was set up to address the "unresolved public policy issue" of assisted suicide in the UK.
In practice its recommendations are concerned with legislation in England and Wales.
The body was established in 2010 as a result of concerns about the growing number of Britons paying to end their lives at the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland.
In addition, a statement by England's Director of Public Prosecutions – following a number of highly publicised right-to-die legal battles – appeared to have decriminalised "amateur" assistance to die by distinguishing between compassionate and malicious actions.
Although describing itself as an independent body, questions have been raised about how impartial the commission can be when it was set up using funding from novelist Terry Pratchett and River Island tycoon Bernard Lewis, both advocates of assisted dying.
Administrative and research support has also been provided by the left-wing think tank, Demos, while Lord Falconer – the peer appointed to lead the commission – has described the law on assisted dying as "no longer fit".
However, the commission said it would "act entirely independently and the commission alone will be responsible for its conclusions. The commission will be independent from Demos and the funders."
It has 11 members, including MPs, and medical, religious and hospice experts. Only one said he would not back the recommendation to change the law.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article