THE world's five billion mobile phone users may be at risk of certain types of brain cancer and have been urged to consider ways of reducing their exposure after new research.
The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said a review of all scientific evidence suggested mobile phone use should be classified as “possibly carcinogenic”.
Other items in this category include lead, engine exhaust fumes and chloroform.
It is the furthest any report has gone in warning about the effects of mobile phone radio waves on the human body.
The study, carried out by a working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries, contradicts an earlier statement by the organisation that there were no established links between the handsets and cancer.
Jonathan Samet, IARC chairman, said: “After reviewing the evidence ... the working group classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans.”
He added some evidence suggested a link between an increased risk of glioma, a type of brain cancer, and mobile phone use.
However, cancer experts urged the public to keep the findings in perspective.
Ed Yong, head of health information at Cancer Research UK, said: “The WHO’s verdict means there is some evidence linking mobile phones to cancer but it is too weak to draw strong conclusions from. The vast majority of existing studies have not found a link between phones and cancer, and if such a link exists, it is unlikely to be a large one.
“The risk of brain cancer is similar in people who use mobile phones compared to those who don’t, and rates of this cancer have not gone up in recent years despite a dramatic rise in phone use during the 1980s. However, not enough is known to totally rule out a risk, and there has been little research on the long-term effects of using phones.”
The decision comes after a study last year, which looked at 13,000 mobile phone users over 10 years, found no clear answer on whether the devices cause brain tumours.
The new findings could prompt the UN health body to look again at its guidelines on mobile phones, the IARC scientists said, but more research is needed before a definitive answer on a link can be given.
The report has been keenly awaited by phone companies and campaign groups who have raised concerns about whether mobile phones might be harmful to health. Around five billion handsets are currently in use worldwide, with 76 million handsets owned in the UK.
The WHO said a person using a mobile phone about 12 inches away from their body, for example when text messaging, accessing the internet, or using a hands free device – will have a much lower exposure to radio-frequency fields than someone holding the handset against their head.
Further advice states that exposure is also reduced by limiting the number and length of calls. Using the phone in areas of good reception also decreases exposure as it allows the phone to transmit at reduced power.
Commercial devices for reducing radio frequency field exposure have not been shown to be effective, WHO officials said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article