THE doctor-patient relationship will change forever after a ruling by the UK's highest court, according to the Scottish legal firm which represented the mother involved in the case.
Nadine Montgomery claimed that she had not been made fully aware of the specific risks of being a diabetic of small stature before giving birth to son Sam in Bellshill Maternity Hospital, Lanarkshire, in October 1999.
Sam, who has cerebral palsy, was asphyxiated during the birth after his shoulder became stuck. It took staff 12 minutes to free him, after which he had to be resuscitated - resulting in brain damage.
On Wednesday, seven UK Supreme Court judges found in favour of Mrs Montgomery in the landmark Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board case.
Mrs Montgomery, 40, will receive £5.25m as a result of the judgment.
Fred Tyler, a senior litigation partner with Edinburgh legal firm Balfour & Manson LLP, who represented Mrs Montgomery, said: "My primary wish has always been to secure a positive outcome for Mrs Montgomery and her son. The settlement will allow her to ensure Sam receives the best possible care for the rest of his life.
"In a wider context, this is almost certainly the most significant medical negligence judgment in 30 years - a momentous decision which will affect the doctor-patient relationship throughout the UK."
The case hinged on whether the Health Board went far enough in advising Mrs Montgomery - a Type 1 diabetic - of all the potential risks of giving birth to her son. It is recognised that diabetic mothers can give birth to larger than average babies, putting them at risk of complications from traditional births.
Mrs Montgomery expressed concerns during pregnancy about her ability to deliver the baby safely. Her obstetrician was aware of the risks of the baby's shoulder becoming stuck during the birth, but made a decision not to discuss this with Mrs Montgomery.
She indicated that had she been advised of the risks, she would have elected for a Caesarean section.
Mr Tyler added: "If she had been properly advised of the risks, she would have opted for Caesarean section - and her child would have been delivered uninjured."
Mrs Montgomery, who lost the initial case in the Court of Session in Edinburgh and also lost an appeal, said: "This judgment is an enormous relief after a very long legal fight. I believe that I had the right to know of all the risks surrounding Sam's birth - and I am pleased the Supreme Court has recognised that. I hope this means that other patients will not have to go through what I have gone through.
"The decision will allow me to ensure Sam receives the best possible care for the rest of his life."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article