The Commons Health Committee said minimum pricing for drink is one of a number of proposals which should be brought in to stem a "shocking" rise in alcohol abuse.
Raising the price of drinks would be the most effective way to reduce consumption and the number of alcohol-related deaths, according to the committee.
The Scottish Government is proposing to bring in a minimum price per unit for alcohol.
But with Labour, the Tories and the Liberal Democrats all opposed to the proposal, ministers lack the parliamentary support to get the measure passed.
The move is also opposed by some in the drinks industry, with the Scotch Whisky Association claiming it would be "both illegal and ineffective".
However Dr Brian Keighley, who chairs the British Medical Association in Scotland, said the Westminster committee's report "recognises that sensible drinking starts with sensible pricing and that minimum pricing should form the central plank of any alcohol strategy".
He added: "I hope that our own MSPs will take on board the committee's findings and listen to the experts, not those who stand to profit from a watered down alcohol strategy."
He insisted "radical action" is needed to tackle alcohol misuse and he called on Holyrood`s Health Committee to take account of the Westminster report when it considers the Scottish Government's Alcohol Bill, which contains the proposal for minimum pricing.
"After listening to the evidence presented to them, members of the Westminster Health Committee have supported the introduction of minimum pricing because they are as convinced as the medical profession that it will reduce alcohol consumption, a move which could prevent almost half of all alcohol-related deaths in Scotland."
However Campbell Evans of the Scotch Whisky Association, said the MPs had "simply re-hashed restrictive blanket policies that fail to target problem drinkers, whilst penalising moderate consumers".
He said their stance is "disappointing but unsurprising", and added: "In calling for minimum pricing, the committee is seeking to introduce a measure that we believe to be both illegal and ineffective."
Mr Evans said: "The Health Committee is right to call for more efforts to tackle alcohol-related harm. However it would have been far better for the committee to examine what effective measures to tackle alcohol harm could be brought forward in partnership between government, retailers and producers."
Nationalist MP John Mason said the Westminster committee's report "drives a coach and horses through the arguments of those opposing the SNP's minimum pricing proposals".
The Glasgow East MP added: "Opposition politicians in the UK Parliament recognise minimum pricing is a practical approach to tackling our problem relationship with booze.
"Their colleagues in the Scottish Parliament must follow this lead and back the SNP's proposals.
"Just as the smoking ban did, this issue must unite the Scottish Parliament, not divide it. Scotland's public health must be above opposition for opposition's sake."
Scottish Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said the Westminster report had "comprehensively rubbished" claims by opponents of minimum pricing that the policy would punish moderate drinkers and was illegal.
Ms Sturgeon insisted: "Minimum pricing won't raise the price of all drinks - it targets the dirt-cheap supermarket ciders, lagers and low-grade spirits favoured by problem drinkers. By contrast, the responsibly priced products favoured by the majority will be almost completely untouched."
And she added: "European parliamentary answers have made clear that the European Commission does not object to minimum pricing for alcohol as long as it is proportionate and has clear benefits for public health."
The Health Secretary argued: "Robust, independent research has shown that minimum pricing could save lives, cut illness and crime and reduce the massive burden alcohol misuse places on public services."
And she said: "It is notable that this report holds Scotland up as an example to be emulated. It shows that we have not been afraid to be at the vanguard of public health policy before - and we can be again.
"I call on everyone who cares about Scotland's health to do the right thing and unite behind the Alcohol Bill."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article