A SIMPLE genetic test could improve diagnosis of prostate cancer, researchers believe.
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer to affect men in Scotland, and scientists believe the test, which spots problem cells that can appear healthy under a microscope, will prevent men from undergoing repeated invasive investigations.
Teams from the universities of Edinburgh and St Andrews led research into the new test, which is being developed with diagnostics firm MDxHealth.
Currently, men who have high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in their blood are sent for a biopsy of the prostate gland to find out if they have prostate cancer. In some cases the biopsy will be negative or unclear, but a repeat PSA test will leave doctors concerned.
These men face the prospect of having another biopsy, to check cancer was not missed. This means another painful rectal probe, with a risk of being admitted to hospital, even though the chance of having cancer is less than 30%.
The new test probes the DNA of the tissue sample extracted the first time and looks for genetic changes that signify cancer. It works by recognising the "halo" of cells that forms around a prostate tumour.
The Scottish research team reported details of its accuracy in the Journal of Urology.
Dr Grant Stewart, of Edinburgh University, said: "This new test means men do not have to continue to have these unpleasant and unnecessary tests and gives them a bit of certainty."
He said the test, which is not yet available for use on the NHS, could reduce the number of repeat biopsies by 68%.
The most recent figures, from 2010, show that 2679 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in Scotland in a year.
Chris Garner, 74, from Edinburgh, who has undergone radiotherapy for prostate cancer, said: "The tests we currently have often leave men with uncertainty, as they have a surprisingly high rate of false positive and false negative results.
"Anything we can do that would give more accurate information to men about their condition would go a long way to easing that difficult process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article