The £142,000-a-year NHS director of public health says society would benefit if the medical profession -- which enjoyed substantial pay increases when new working conditions were introduced five years ago -- was paid less.
Dr Linda de Caestecker, a director for Greater Glasgow and Clyde told The Herald that doctors, including herself, should consider a reduction in salary and stop demanding significant pay increases every year.
The move comes as Finance Secretary John Swinney considers calls for a 5% across-the-board pay cut for senior public-sector staff to address the squeeze on Government finances.
Dr de Caestecker bases her argument on the belief that pay inequality needs to change to address some of Scotland’s entrenched health problems.
Asked if she would be willing to sacrifice some of her own income, Dr de Caestecker said: “I suppose the simple answer is yes, if it was done in a fair and transparent way and was about redistributing income across the pay scales between the well-off and less-well-off.”
The public health director, who publishes her annual report today, questioned what would be achieved by her taking a solitary stand, saying: “I think it would be much better if it was done in a way that, as a profession, we were saying we understand health inequalities are to do with inequalities in income as well as opportunity, aspiration and environment, and we will lead the way on that.
“I think we should as a profession say we want a more equal society, therefore we will not be fighting for large pay increases, particularly at a time like this, when the public sector will be facing financial challenges.”
The earning power of doctors became particularly controversial after new contracts boosted salaries while cutting working hours in 2004.
Hospital consultants are said to have enjoyed a 25% pay rise, while a recent survey by the magazine Scottish Review showed 13 senior NHS staff were paid more than the First Minister. The average pre-tax salary of a Scottish contractor GP is nearly £90,000.
Dr de Caestecker’s annual report, described as her manifesto for health improvement over the next two years, notes that a 15-year-old boy in a deprived area of Glasgow has only a 50% chance of reaching his 60th birthday, while for his counterpart in a more affluent area the chance is 90%.
She later quotes other commentators on the need for the wealthy to change as well as the poor in order to redress the balance, and says of the medical profession: “I wonder how many of us would be willing to campaign for salary reductions for the overall benefit of society, yet we might actually be better off if this happened.”
Professor Phil Hanlon, a public health expert at Glasgow University and a trained doctor, said there was evidence that in more equal societies everyone fared better, and that doctors should take some leadership on this issue.
He added: “The embarrassing thing is that doctors have done well in the last 10 years or so. That puts us at least with the possibility that people will say it is a bit rich coming from us, this kind of message.”
The British Medical Association Scotland, which negotiates pay deals on behalf of doctors, did not want to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article